We discussed sustainability and agri-food strategies in the Valencian Community

The Foundation has organised a conference on sustainability in the Comunitat Valenciana, which took place at the Cajamar premises and was attended by a number of speakers who discussed the issue.

Eduardo Rojas, a forestry engineer, pointed out, when referring to the Poyo ravine, that “nobody has mentioned that one of its problems was the amount of abandoned farmland it contained, which led to it bursting its banks”, and criticised the injustice of focusing on negative environmental economic measures whilst ignoring the positive ones. Rojas, who is also a lecturer at the UPV, spoke of the regional challenges we face, such as the decline of rural communities; furthermore, he emphasised that nowadays, “we have fewer fires, but the few that do occur burn more intensely every day and are more virulent”. For Rojas, “we are attempting to tackle the challenge of wildfires by addressing the consequences, rather than the causes.” Montes also proposed “tackling small-scale landholdings, strengthening the regional level for service provision and ensuring an appropriate scale, guaranteeing a fair and stable legal framework for the provision of environmental services, training and educating the public on how to respond to emergencies, to increase employment in rural areas, to depoliticise agricultural organisations, to encourage young people to pursue higher education, and to restore the value of the Mediterranean diet”, amongst the numerous proposals he put forward in his speech dedicated to territorial, environmental and social challenges.

The event began with a welcome from Cajamar’s regional director, Jesús García, and from Angel Marhuenda, director of the CAP (Common Agricultural Policy), who, together with the president of the Fundación Premios Rei Jaume I, Javier Quesada, introduced the various speakers.

The director of the Cajamar Group Foundation, Manuel Laínez, argued, for example, in favour of “reducing the size of companies and relaxing the obligation to implement emissions reduction schemes”. On the subject of climate change, Laínez emphasised that “we have exceeded the 1.5-degree threshold and this year we are still seeing very high averages, with increasingly higher temperatures and greater rainfall. “Advances in technology facilitate innovation through engineering,” he said, and outlined all the tools available to us in biotechnology “which help us with everything related to plant material, making it more resilient and resistant to diseases and pests, whilst improving natural resources and their use, as well as the incorporation of functional ingredients”. For Laínez, “when we are efficient, we manage to reduce our environmental footprints and we will become more competitive”. According to the director of the Cajamar Foundation, the industry of the future “is moving towards cloud-based control linked to new products incorporating AI that respond to producers’ needs—something we are already seeing on today’s farms, where the entire product value chain is managed, from the field to the warehouse, based on various parameters: efficiency, reduction of carbon footprint emissions, with simulation using digital twins that help them visualise what it would be like: organisation, innovation, digital transformation, the incorporation of new technologies and supply chain strategy.” Furthermore, he criticised the fact that “since 2018, investment in R&D&I in Spain has barely increased, with investment in innovation standing at a mere 0.8 per cent. And for 50 years we have been supporting investment in the agri-food chain, trying to make mistakes ourselves so that farmers do not have to. Through special incubator projects for start-ups,” argued Manuel Laínez.

The Director-General for Industry and the Agri-Food Chain, Ernesto Fernández, spoke about rural development, identifying depopulation as the main problem we face, and pointed out that “90 per cent of the population is concentrated in 30 per cent of the territory”, citing the example of Castell de Cabres – the least populated municipality in the entire Valencian Community, located in the Bajo Maestrazgo region with just 22 inhabitants – as the prime example. Fernández explained that “in Castellón, 81.41 per cent of municipalities have fewer than 3,000 inhabitants – that is 110 municipalities – whilst in the province of Valencia, Rincón de Ademuz tops the depopulation statistics”. For the Director-General, the common factor linking all these depopulated villages “is agriculture, where young farmers account for just 5.18 per cent and half of all farmers are over 65 years old, whilst there has been a 35 per cent decline in the number of people registered with the Social Security system. “And by 2023, we will have reached 173,676 ha of abandoned land – or, to put it another way, 2,290 ha more than the previous year – and we are the leaders in Spain in terms of land abandonment,” he emphasised.

Tomás García Azcárate, a CAP specialist, reflected on various issues surrounding the subject: “Agriculture exists to produce food, but it must do so in a sustainable manner; climate change is happening and farmers are amongst its victims.” He called for research into new orange varieties, for example, “to achieve a better balance between the cold and heat caused by climate change.” For García, “adapting to and mitigating climate change is everyone’s responsibility, and it is better to persuade than to force. ‘Von der Leyen’s first Commission has been a despotic bureaucratic blow,’ he denounced, reaffirming that ‘the despotism of the Green Deal is still very much present’. According to the CAP specialist, ‘Spanish agriculture is doing well, but things are not going well for the middle class of family farmers. There isn’t enough money for everyone or for everything, so support for farmers must go to those who need it, whilst large businesses that are doing well do not need help to continue growing,” he pointed out. “The priority,” he asserts, “must be to support the rural middle class – 97 per cent of the agricultural population, professional family farmers – as they move towards Agriculture 4.0 and the agroecological transition.” He added that “the government can and must help to build a more balanced food chain.”

Testimonials

During the testimonials session, six representatives from various companies took part to share their experiences of sustainability. Carlota de Dios spoke about the @TierraBobal tourist destination brand, “an integrated offering featuring landscapes and wine-related activities, wine tourism, gastronomic tourism, etc. “We are part of a system and we don’t realise it,” she said, referring to sustainability “as the capacity to endure over time”.

Vicent Faro, a farmer, organic producer and president of @CAECV, spoke of the three daily challenges: territorial, environmental and social, alongside innovation that supports sustainable production, and explained the various standards that certify organic production.

Javier Gandía, director of Bodegas Vicente Gandía, explained the various certifications that endorse his brand, which covers nearly 500 ha of vineyard area spread across different regions, practising sustainable agriculture and undertaking various projects – such as the latest one, for which they are channelling the funds raised to an animal welfare foundation.

Carmen Morales, director of quality and sustainability at Anecoop, explained the various sustainability tools available to the cooperative’s members. “The time is now,” she said of the cooperative, which has over 20,000 members in Spain and whose commercial network extends across the globe, although she acknowledged that “sustainability is not yet truly integrated”.

Olga Moreno, a doctor and agricultural engineer as well as a lecturer in the Department of Economics and Social Sciences, called for a change in the way choices are structured, which pushes us to buy certain foods in the shops: “In our daily lives, we are pushed to choose between A or B, so we should be guided towards sustainable products that are promoted with reliable, easy-to-read labels to help us make quick decisions; in other words, sustainable options should be easily identifiable and affordable,” she argued, whilst appealing to society’s sense of responsibility.

Finally, Inmaculada Sanfeliu spoke about Intercitrus, plant protection, CRISPR research and the promotion so strongly called for by the sector. She cited ZUVamesa as a model of sustainability – a leading example in areas such as energy, the environment and zero waste – which arose “from the need to promote an industry for citrus fruits that cannot be sold on the fresh produce market.” Sanfeliu pointed out that “the citrus sector ranks third in the Comunitat Valenciana, where one in every four oranges exported worldwide is Spanish, and more than 70 per cent of the citrus trade originates from the Comunitat Valenciana, with 175,000 lorries leaving each year, covering 307,000 hectares – the equivalent of 330,000 football pitches – which would absorb between 1.7 million tonnes of CO₂,” he concluded.

Rei Jaume I Prize-winning women scientists vindicate the search for equality and parity but are aware of society’s slowdown after the pandemic.

“We are about to see a much more masculinized society,” says Ángela Nieto, Rei Jaume I Prize winner in 2009 and speaker at the conference.

The president of the Rei Jaume I Prizes Foundation, Javier Quesada, defends the path of parity, but without losing sight of excellence: “In the Awards we seek excellence, not gender”, he says.

The ninth edition of the colloquium dedicated to Women, Science and Business was held as part of the celebrations for Women’s Day on March 8 and the conclusions are still not optimistic, despite the amount of information that exists on the subject. “Since the pandemic, in general, interest in science has decreased and the impact is greater among women,” denounced Ángela Nieto, winner of the 2009 Rei Jaume I Prize and one of the participants in the conference. “In that curve of equality – stated Nieto – it seems that we have not only stopped, but we are going a little down. And the future in coming careers, such as those related to Artificial Intelligence, it is alarming to see the low number of women specialists in the field” and warned that ‘we are about to see a much more masculinized society’.

In this edition, the Foundation wanted to begin with a playful monologue by the company Big Van Science, whose spokeswoman, Helena González, entertained the audience with a presentation on the role and importance of women in science and business. In the discussion that followed, everyone agreed with this statement.

After the monologue, the president of the Javier Quesada Foundation has told some of the characteristics of the Rei Jaume I Prizes and explained that, among other data, “to date, in these 36 editions of awards, about 400 personalities have participated in the jury, of which 30% are women.” And he added that “the proportion this year will be 40% women against 60% men, so we are on the way to parity, but we are looking for excellence, not gender” he emphasized.

And in the colloquium, which this year has been moderated by the biochemist and science popularizer, Pere Estupinyà, the three Rei Jaume I Prize winners who have participated have given play to very different interpretations.

Thus, Laura Lechuga, Rei Jaume I Price in 2020 has stated that “we are going very little by little” and has claimed to think of more actions to promote female leadership “since the improvement is very small, because in most elite estates is dominated by men” and Ángela Nieto explained that in her opinion, “it is a matter and responsibility of women themselves despite the fact that there is a constant questioning of female leadership and that would be solved with a strengthening from childhood, with girls, because we can not afford the questioning of female leadership” to which Ángela Perez, Rei Jaume I Entrepreneur Price 2022 replied and protested “by the term of female after the word leadership and the theorization of certain terms”.

Regarding the new generations, they wanted to send a message to the young women about the importance of choosing a partner and the importance of a favorable family environment. “Knowing who we choose to share our life with and making it compatible with our professional career”, recognized Ángela Nieto, “since the drama in biomedicine is that we are many at the beginning, but very few leaders at the end of the career”.

Laura Lechuga explained that “the main problem is in education. If we do not work from the early years, from the very beginning with boys and girls, in educating and modulating in equality, it will be difficult to do so when they grow up”. In addition, she has also criticized the prejudices of certain men who think “that some women are in some positions just because they are women”.

Ángela Pérez has spoken out against the prejudices of some women who criticize her for not being completely dedicated to the care of their children. Nieto corroborated this with her experience and the feelings of culpability of many women after childbirth, “when biologically, it has been proven that a mother’s brain is modified by childbirth and the amount of hormones that are produced”, which is why she advocates the four ideals: freedom, culture, history and biology”.

Pere Estupinyà spoke on the subject of the influence of culture and on the prizes  in general and the difficulty of finding similar numbers of candidates to which Nieto said that “the problem is that women do not present themselves, since which is low is the number of candidatures” and has advocated to promote female leadership ”because it is the women themselves that we do not believe it and while we continue to separate by blue and pink colors in the hospitals or giving away different types of toys by sex or refer to doctors and nurses we will not reach complete equality. ”

The moderator returned to the issue of education, with the example of the Princeton University study that shows, among other conclusions, that at the age of 6 many girls consider themselves less intelligent than boys, so they questioned the application of certain policies and quotas that have not always worked out well because “it is difficult to impose nominations in the absence of scientific excellence, we must look for these women and advocate for parity juries”, defended Laura Lechuga, who also ended by recognizing that “men sell themselves in an incredible way compared to women, so a jury immediately captures the men first because of the way they sell themselves”.

Finally, it was concluded that “when there is an involution, society suffers and after the pandemic, this “weariness” about science issues and, above all, about feminism, is growing and is felt among the new generations who seem to be fed up with having to be the heroines or scientists of the new society, so the worrying thing will come in about 10 years, when science laboratories need to be replaced”, it was commented at the end of the symposium.